Thursday, November 16, 2006
OJ Simpson: If I Did It
Oakland attorney John Burris was a part of the "dream team" defense that earned O.J. Simpson an acquittal in 1995 in the lurid double-murder trial that captivated the nation. So when he heard that Simpson had written a book called, "If I Did It,'' Burris' response was simple and direct.
"Has O.J. lost his mind? I can't imagine anything more ridiculous.''
That seems to be the consensus. It could be said that the national reaction was split 50-50. Half the country thought it was the dumbest idea they'd ever heard, and the other half thought Simpson was out of his mind.
Oh, and that's not to mention the two one-hour television interviews with Simpson to be conducted on Fox television by Judith Regan, the book's publisher, on Nov. 27 and 29. Regan's company, ReganBooks, is a subsidiary of News Corp., which also owns Fox.
"This makes Fox's 'Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Millionaire?' look like 'Masterpiece Theatre,' " said Bob Thompson, director for of the Center for the Study of Popular Television at Syracuse University.
Frankly, it is even worse than that. This is a sleazy reach for ratings -- the interviews will air in the last week of ratings sweeps -- and book-buying buzz. There's money to be made for Fox and for the publisher.
But everyone is asking: Why is Simpson doing this?
The obvious guess is that Simpson needs money, but Burris says that's a misconception. He says -- and a 1997 court hearing in Santa Monica confirms -- that Simpson is pulling in roughly $25,000 a month from a "profit-sharing pension account.''
Simpson was ordered to pay $33.5 million to the heirs of his slain ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ron Goldman, but much of the judgment has not been paid because most of Simpson's assets were tied up in his pension account -- which is shielded from creditors by state law. It is unclear whether any money he may make from the book could be used to pay part of the judgment.
So why would Simpson expose himself to more doubts, accusations and anger with the book and TV interviews? Burris thinks the key is a conversation he had over dinner with the late Johnnie Cochran, head of Simpson's defense team.
Cochran said he thought Simpson had never recovered from the loss of his celebrity status as a Heisman Trophy-winning, NFL-record-setting superstar.
"O.J. wants back what he had,'' Cochran told Burris. "He wants to be the O.J. that he was.''
This will certainly put Simpson back in the spotlight. It can be argued that this is the best "get'' in the news business. To have an interview with Simpson in which he appears to confess to the most famous murders in recent American history is a surefire ratings and bookselling bonanza.
"I guess the only thing bigger would be to bring Princess Diana back from the dead,'' says Robert Calo, a senior lecturer at UC Berkeley and former network news producer at ABC and NBC. "In terms of American stories, O.J. Simpson is a special case.''
The question -- and get ready for weeks of speculation -- is this: What is Simpson really saying? A magazine called Life & Style Weekly says in an upcoming issue that Simpson is asked to read a chapter from the book during his Fox interview and bursts into tears. The magazine quotes an unnamed source as saying, "It sounds like he's confessing.''
But is he? He could, of course. He's already been acquitted. He can't be tried again. But with a title like "If I Did It,'' he and Regan are building in plenty of wiggle room.
"If the word 'if' weren't in the title,'' says Thompson, "it would be newsworthy. But if, as I suspect, it is just a typical O.J. tirade, and the title is simply a way to get attention, it is absolutely sick and downright creepy.''
And by the way, where's the journalism in this? Simpson is being interviewed by his publisher, not a hard-hitting journalist or attorney. Even Fox admits this isn't a news show. It is appearing as programming on the Fox network, which is the entertainment arm.
"If you ever wanted to know what media critics are afraid of, here it is,'' says Cal's Calo. "It doesn't smell like news, or not anymore. You can't tell.''
And finally, what does that say about us? It is easy to say that Simpson should pipe down and move on, but will you be able to resist watching the interviews or buying the book? Thompson is hoping for the best.
"I wouldn't want to bet my retirement fund that this is going to be No. 1 (ratings winner) for the week,'' he says. "There's a chance people will collectively ignore it.''
And wouldn't that be encouraging? Unfortunately, history suggests otherwise. It's simple. Did O.J. Simpson get away with murder? Everyone still wants to know.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
This woman is awesome. Such great spin I'm nearly dizzy with compassion for her:
O.J. Simpson has already been tried in the court of public opinion. Now, it's Judith Regan's turn.
After days of derisive speculation and scathing criticism directed at the founder of Regan Books, portrayed in the media's most generous light as the she-devil who both interviewed Simpson for his forthcoming TV special and funded the printing of his quasi-confession, the publishing magnate has finally come to her own defense.
Regan released an eight-page statement Friday defending her decision to publish the hypothetical tell-all O.J. Simpson: If I Did It, Here's How It Happened, denying reports that the acquitted footballer would in any way profit from the tome or use the opportunity to flaunt his not guilty verdict.
"In the past few days, since the announcement of the forthcoming book and televised interview If I Did It, it has been strange watching the media spin the story," she writes.
"They have all but called for my death for publishing his book and for interviewing him. A death, I might add, not called for when Katie Couric interviewed him; not called for when Barbara Walters had an exclusive with the Menendez brothers."
Of course, neither Couric nor Walters had the potential to profit off their interviews, as opposed to Regan, who's the puppetmaster behind the book and two-night prime-time Fox special and could make a tidy sum from the headline-generating controversy.
Still, she claims that she agreed to publish the book to reverse the "criminal injustice system" that led to Simpson's acquittal, saying "what I wanted was closure, not money."
According to Regan, she wanted to coax Simpson, whom she liberally refers to throughout her statement as "the killer," into confessing to the 1995 murders of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman, as well as to seek closure on her own history of domestic abuse.
"I never lost my desire for his conviction," she writes. "And if Marcia Clark couldn't do it, I sure wanted to try.
" 'To publish' does not mean 'to endorse.' It means 'to make public.' I made the decision to publish this book and to sit face to face with the killer, because I wanted him, and the men who broke my heart and your hearts, to tell the truth, to confess their sins, to do penance and to amend their lives.
"I wanted the confession for my own selfish reasons and for the symbolism of that act."
That accounts for her motivation. The verdict's still out on Simpson's.
"I don't know why he did it—why he did the book and sat for the interview," Regan continues. "Was it his own disturbed need for attention? Did he have remorse?...When I sat face to face with the killer, I wanted him to confess, to release us all from the wound of the conviction that was lost on that fall day in October of 1995."
Regan also downplays suggestions that Simpson has the potential to profit from his hypothetical confession—the National Enquirer reported that he pocketed $3.5 million in the book deal.
"What I do know is I didn't pay him," Regan adds. "I contracted through a third party who owns the rights, and I was told the money would go to his children. That much I could live with."
To further ensure that Simpson won't see a penny from his book sales, lawyers for Ron Goldman's father, Fred, said they would take legal action to seize any profits from the pseudo-memoir to collect against the wrongful death civil judgment. In 1997, Simpson was found liable for both deaths by a jury, which ordered the footballer to pay $33.5 million to the families of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown. The bulk of the sum remains unpaid.
"If he's making money off [the book], then Fred Goldman is entitled to it, and we'll try to get it," attorney Peter Gelblum said. "We're making every effort to look into it and figure it out and try to get the money."
O.J. Simpson: If I Did It, Here's How It Happened, which will be marketed as a "true crime" book, is due in stores Nov. 30. Despite—or maybe because of—its controversy, it's already reached number 20 on Amazon.com's bestseller list. While a large portion of independent book shops have refused to carry the book, major chain retailers, like Barnes & Noble and Borders, will offer it and have already reported strong interest in the title. A Borders rep also said any profits will be donated to a charity helping victims of domestic violence.
The two-night TV special, If I Did It, airs Nov. 27 and 29 on Fox.
Paul Harris in New York
Sunday November 19, 2006
The Observer
It must have seemed like a good idea to someone. The man most Americans believe is behind their country's most infamous murder agrees to a virtual confession in a book and TV interview. Surely it would be a ratings and publishing smash.
Not quite so fast. For in reality OJ Simpson has succeeded where millions of angry liberals have always failed: striking a direct blow at the media empire of Rupert Murdoch, and especially its controversial broadcasting arm, headed by Fox television.
A wave of revulsion and open criticism, reaching a climax this weekend, has swept America in the wake of revelations that Simpson intends to capitalise on the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown and her friend Ron Goldman with a book and TV 'confession' in a £1.8 million deal brokered by Murdoch-owned companies. So widespread is the condemnation that even some of the top names on Murdoch's own cable channel, Fox News, have urged viewers not to buy the book or watch the interview.
It is no surprise. In both book and interview Simpson describes how he would have murdered Brown and Goldman. But only if 'hypothetically' he had done it. He even describes the amount of blood that would have been caused by slashing the pair to death.
The extent of the reaction perhaps typifies a case that has both outraged and enthralled Americans.
Certainly, the public vilification of Simpson seems to have taken its toll on Judith Regan, the controversial US book publisher who conducted the interview and whose Murdoch-owned ReganBooks is behind the deal. She has issued a bizarre eight-page defence of the deal in which she confessed to being a battered wife and that she felt the spirit of the slain couple in the room with her as she spoke to Simpson.
Given the scale of the backlash, it is no surprise that Regan is feeling the pressure. Murdoch and Fox must have been taken aback at the sheer speed at which the publishing scoop of the century has turned into a potential public relations disaster.
Local TV stations have already been swamped by complaints from the public, prompting many to opt out of showing the interview.
The outrage has spread to the publishing world, where revulsion at the book itself, entitled If I Did It, has already seen some stores start sending it back.
The anger was sharpened by publicity stunts such as the colouring of the 'I Did It' part of the book's title in red, and the fading of the 'If' into a pale white. In California the owner of Brentwood Bookstore, near where the murders took place, has refused to stock it, while the Northern California Independent Booksellers' Association, made up of some 240 bookstores, has emailed its members suggesting cash generated by the book be donated to domestic violence charities. Even some of the biggest media names in Murdoch's own empire have joined the fray, though the cynical might interpret that as a clever media ploy to have one's cake and eat it.
Bill O'Reilly, the conservative and outspoken anchor of a talk show on Fox News, called for a boycott of advertisers who buy ad space during the two-hour long interview. Another Fox star, Geraldo Rivera, famous for his patriotic stance on the war on terror, declared that the Simpson deal was 'appalling' and vowed to oppose it.
The Fox channel has long been a liberal bete noire and the subject of numerous documentaries about its obvious conservative bias. But the Simpson scandal is different, with the sheer involvement of Murdoch's empire striking at the heart of middle America. It was controlled from the start by disparate elements of Murdoch's News Corp empire: ReganBooks is owned by Murdoch's HarperCollins. The interview is to be shown on two separate shows on Murdoch's Fox network, just in time for a vital ratings boost that will set lucrative future advertising rates. And news of the deal was first revealed in the Murdoch-owned New York Post last week.
The New York Daily News, bitter rival to the Post, immediately came out blasting both its editorial barrels at Murdoch and Regan. In an editorial directly addressed to Regan, the newspaper accused her and her boss of making blood money. 'He did it for buckets of bloody bucks, just as you and Murdoch are,' the paper thundered.
But Murdoch is used to media storms. Fox, too, has long revelled in controversial attention. Both have often trusted the old adage that there is no such thing as bad publicity, even when it involves Simpson's hypothetical confession of a murder that was all too real. But if millions of Americans still tune in to watch or buy the book, then Murdoch will have had the last laugh over his critics.
It would not be the first time.
Where are they now?
The lawyer
Johnnie Cochran, OJ's lawyer, attracted as much attention in the trial as OJ himself or the famous glove the footballer struggled to pull on in front of the court. Cochrane died in 2005.
OJ's home
The house in Brentwood, Hollywood, where the former football star once lived, was sold long ago and demolished.
The restaurant
Mezzaluna, where Nicole Brown Simpson, OJ's former wife, had dinner before her murder has been replaced by a coffee shop.
The condo
The house number has been changed on the condo where Nicole and friend Ronald Goldman were killed.
Related articles
12.09.2006: Rupert Murdoch jumps into bed with Crazy Frog
08.09.2006: Murdoch pockets £14m pay packet
News Corp at Pebble Beach
28.07.2006: Bono and Blair to join Murdoch on the beach
The Murdoch dynasty
04.10.2006: Lachlan Murdoch happy in Australia, says wife
04.10.2006: Lachlan may return to the fold, says Murdoch Sr
24.07.2006: Murdoch's eldest will inherit power
07.11.2005: Murdoch makes pledge on succession
26.08.2005: Murdoch heir quit with £9m payout
07.01.2004: Murdoch hints at power sharing between sons
15.10.2003: Murdoch delays retirement 'forever'
Murdoch and politics
29.06.2006: Murdoch hints at election backing for Cameron
19.09.2005: NUJ blasts Blair's 'devotion to Murdoch'
Interviews
12.02.2006: Rupert, up close and cuddly
23.01.2006: Cameron should offer substance, says Murdoch
25.11.2005: Murdoch: I'm proud of my legacy
24.11.2005: Murdoch predicts gloomy future for press
24.11.2005: 'They all hate me because of Sky'
28.11.2005: Emily Bell: We're over you, Rupert
Lunch with Rupert?
11.11.2005: Murdoch lunch bill totals $57,100
Murdoch in America
14.10.2005: At home with Rupert and Wendi
17.12.2004: Murdoch homes in on Manhattan's most expensive flat
Internet strategy
04.01.2006: New internet boss at News Corp
08.09.2005: News Corp snaps up online game company
20.07.2005: Emily Bell: Murdoch's tangled web
MediaGuardian.co.uk special reports
Rupert Murdoch
BSkyB
After a firestorm of criticism, News Corp. has reconsidered its plan to release a controversial O.J. Simpson book and television special, with chairman and CEO Rupert Murdoch taking the extraordinary step of personally apologizing for the pain it might have caused the families of the victims of 1994 double murder.
"I and senior management agree with the American public that this was an ill-considered project," Murdoch said in a statement Monday. "We are sorry for any pain this has caused the families of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown-Simpson."
If I Did It, the book in which the former football star "hypothetically" discusses how he would have committed the murders if he had done them, was to be published Nov. 30 by ReganBooks, an imprint of News Corp.-owned HarperCollins Publishers. The publication was to have been promoted with a two-part, two-hour interview of Simpson by ReganBooks publisher Judith Regan that had been scheduled to air on News Corp.'s Fox Broadcasting Co. over two nights, Nov. 27 and 29, the final night of the November sweep.
Brown-Simpson, Simpson's ex-wife, was slain along with her friend Goldman on June 12, 1994, at Brown-Simpson's home in Los Angeles. Simpson was tried and acquitted of their murders in 1995 but was later found liable for their deaths in a civil court and ordered to pay $33.5 million to the victims' families. Visit HollywoodReporter.com for more ...
O.J. knew book profits would be blood money
AP
Los Angeles: O.J. Simpson said he knew any profit from his If I Did It book would be 'blood money,' but that he took part in the project to pay his bills.
"It's all blood money and unfortunately I had to join the jackals," Simpson said on Wednesday, referring to authors of books about him. "It helped me get out of debt and secure my homestead," he added. The former professional football star also said in telephone interviews this week that he saw the book as a way to provide for his children financially.
Revolting
The book, said to describe how he hypothetically would have killed ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman, had been scheduled for release on November 30 following the airing of a two-part Simpson interview on Fox earlier this week. News Corporation, owner of Fox Broadcasting and publisher HarperCollins, cancelled the project this week after it was condemned as revolting and exploitative.
Simpson has denied committing the murders, disputed his own publisher's contention that the book amounts to a confession, insisted the title was not his idea, and said the hypothetical sections were written by his ghostwriter.
News Corporation spokesman Andrew Butcher said the company paid $880,000 (Dh3 million) to a third party in connection with the project. Of that amount, $100,000 (Dh367,304) was to go to the book's ghostwriter and the rest to Simpson's children, Butcher said.
"Absolutely no money was ever given to O.J. Simpson by us," he said on Wednesday.
Simpson would not say how much he was paid in advance, but said it was less than the $3.5 million (Dh12.8 million) that has been reported. He said the money has already been spent, some of it on tax obligations.
Butcher said News Corporation has no grounds to try to recoup any of the money because Simpson honoured his end of the contract by producing the book.
Civil ruling
Acquitted of murder in 1995, Simpson was later found liable in a wrongful-death lawsuit filed by Goldman's family. The former football star turned actor has not paid the $33.5 million (Dh123 million) civil judgment, and his National Football League pension and Florida home cannot be seized. He made no apologies for the book and TV deal: "I've been pimped for 12 years. Everyone's made money on me," he said.
OJ's Axed Book Fetching Thousands On E-bay
After media mogul Rupert Murdoch axed a controversial book, OJ Simpson's "If I Did It" has surfaced on eBay where it has been fetching bids of thousands of dollars, the New York Daily News reported Friday.
At least three hardcover versions of the book, in which the football legend describes he would have murdered his wife and her friend if he had done it, were available on e-Bay, the News reported.
Simpson was acquitted in 1995 of the murder charges of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman. The celebrity trial was broadcast live around the country and was intensely followed abroad.
Simpson was however later found liable for the deaths in a 1997 civil court decision which awarded the victims' families 33.5 million dollars in damages, though very little has been collected.
A spokesman for eBay, Hani Durzy, was quoted by the Daily news as saying his company was trying to comply with publisher HarperCollins' request that the books be removed from the internet auction site.
Simpson said Wednesday that he had already spent the advance he received.
"Of course I got paid," Simpson told a Miami radio station. "I spend the money on my bills. It's gone."
Following a public outcry from advertisers, booksellers and relatives of the victims, Murdoch's media conglomerate News Corp on Monday decided against distributing Simpson's book, If I Did It, and airing an accompanying two-part television interview on its Fox news network.
Though Simpson, 59, did not reveal how much he was paid, media reports estimate it to be more than 3 million dollars.
In the radio interview Simpson said "I have nothing to confess," maintaining his innocence in the 1994 murders of his wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ron Goldman.
Simpson claimed in the interview that neither the book nor the title were his idea.
"That was their title. That's what they came up with. I didn't pitch anything. I don't make book deals," Simpson said.
Judith Regan Out At HarperCollins
Publisher Judith Regan, who made headlines recently for promoting a book by O.J. Simpson, has been let go by HarperCollins, it was announced in New York.
Regan found herself at the center of a media storm -- and was publicly criticized by News Corps. head Rupert Murdoch -- over her plan to publish "If I Did It." The book purported to be Simpson's take on how he would have killed his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend, Ron Brown, in 1994.
HarperCollins announced Regan's departure Friday with a press release headlined "Judith Regan Terminated," Daily Variety reported.
Regan's imprint, ReganBooks, has been a moneymaker for HarperCollins, issuing books by such authors as Rush Limbaugh and Howard Stern. Simpson's book was to have been accompanied by a TV special in which Regan interviewed Simpson.
Controversy resulted in Murdoch canceling the book and the TV special, and calling the project "ill conceived."
The upcoming slate of releases for ReganBooks includes a fictionalized story about baseball great Mickey Mantle, which is controversial because it allegedly takes liberties with real events -- and suggests Mantle had an affair with Hollywood icon Marilyn Monroe, Variety said.
12/16/2006
LOS ANGELES, Dec. 15 – Judith Regan, the firebrand editor who stirred up decade-old passions last month with her plans for a book and television interview with O. J. Simpson, was fired late Friday by HarperCollins, the publishing company that oversaw her book business.
HarperCollins announced the dismissal, “effective immediately,” in a two-sentence news release that was issued at about 7 p.m. Eastern time. The announcement was made by Jane Friedman, president and chief executive of HarperCollins, who has long had a strained relationship with Ms. Regan.
The Simpson book was to give an account of how he might have murdered his former wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald L. Goldman.
The statement said that the Regan publishing program and staff will continue as part of the HarperCollins General Books Group, but it is unknown whether that group will remain in Los Angeles, where Ms. Regan moved it from New York earlier this year.
It is also unclear whether Ms. Regan has been dismissed only from HarperCollins, or terminated entirely from the News Corporation, Rupert Murdoch’s giant media company. Over the years, Ms. Regan has gained a growing amount of sway within the company because of her ability to generate profits from books and other ventures.
In recent years, she has helped to produce television series and specials, like “Growing Up Gotti,” a series about the children of mafia don John Gotti, which aired on the A&E cable channel. Ms. Regan served as an executive producer of the show.
The news about Ms. Regan’s firing was announced in a news release issued by HarperCollins even before it was transmitted to Regan employees in Los Angeles. Suzanne Wickham, a spokesman for Ms. Regan in Los Angeles, said employees had not been notified of the development before a reporter called to ask to speak to Ms. Regan.
Executives at HarperCollins and the News Corporation in New York and Los Angeles did not return phone calls seeking further comment.
Ms. Regan’s publishing imprint ReganBooks was to release Mr. Simpson's book on Nov. 30, with two one-hour interview segments scheduled to appear on the Fox network for the release.
But a public outcry and criticism from the families of the victims eventually led the News Corporation to cancel the project.
Post a Comment